When my friend spoke,
I didn’t know what she meant. A nuclear attack at a cocktail party?
Then I understood.
Harvard. The syllables mushroom clouded across the room. Har – a flash of light
– vard, the sonic boom. People twitched,
averted their eyes, mumbled nervous insecurities under their breath.
Curiously, many if not
all of those partaking in the conversation had stellar educational
pedigrees. A few may have even gone to
Harvard, too. But somehow the word, the
institution, the idea possessed an extra-human, atomic potential that could
wipe out life at a mere utterance.
How? Why?
The world round,
Harvard has become a byword for genius and truth, a beacon calling out to god-like
creatures who we might only hope to be able to beg to run the world.
Therein lies the
problem. Talk about a complex.
When I get off the T
at Harvard Square, the air twitches with insecurity. Sometimes it looks like pretension. Sometimes curious East Asian tourists mask
the aura as they snap devotional photographs.
But you can’t escape it.
Of course, I know some
amazing and wonderfully well-adjusted people who spent two or four or more
years at Harvard.
But they’re in the
minority. The place, the people – they
need to loosen up in a very big way.
Do something crazy! Fail.
Get a Mohawk, learn to ride a unicycle.
Have a hobby at which you’re mediocre at best.
Facebook is great, but
how many more Mark Zuckerbergs does the world need, no less want?
Having barely gotten
into a much less selective and much less well know liberal arts college – Reed,
in Portland, Oregon – I never worried about scaring people with my alma mater.
Certainly I’ve been
pigeonholed – pot-smoking-hippy school, or
always-in-the-library-never-having-fun school.
Those strike me as mutually exclusive descriptions, but Reed is a paradoxical
place that truly contains multitudes.
Not always perfectly, but solidly well.
Around my sophomore
year or so, I realized the importance of distinguishing between someone who has
been well educated, and someone who is smart, and even more than smart. The difference is profound.
Simply put, if someone
has to tell you where she or he went to school to establish some sort of
intellectual worth or to record some personal success, I’m bored at best. Now, if I have to ask someone where they’ve
studied – if they’ve been to college, what they’ve done for work or where
they’ve learned the most – then I know I’m onto something.
I realize many people
have worked incredibly hard and overcome enormous odds and deserve the
privilege that comes with a degree from a place like Yale or Stanford. Yet if we’re really out to value a person’s
fortitude and to embrace equity and equality, how narrow-minded we are – from
Howard to Michigan State, from Providence College to endless community
colleges, not to mention people who haven’t even graduated from high school –
we don’t have to romanticize genius or fetishize the weak or oppressed to
realize the creativity and boundless potential that exists within every one of us.
Indeed: I’m much
happier to recognize an individual’s hard work, personal accomplishments, and
emotional and ethical self-awareness rather than the name of a school.
That’s certainly how I
would like to be known and valued.
And, for the record,
I’m a huge proponent of nuclear disarmament, for academia as well as for
nation-states.
Go State!
ReplyDelete